Introduction
Backgrnd Info
Experiments
Conclusions
Bibliography
Thursday, May 3, 2007
The second experiment done:
updated{at}5:27 AM
Profile
Hanjing(#09) Sandy(#17) Sarah(#18)
Class: 311'2007
Website: www.ch-oke.blogspot.com
Introduction
The topic that our group will be doing is the chemical reaction between the Mentos and the coke.
We will be observing the different reactions of the coke when the Mentos is placed in at different times.
We decided to do on this topic is because we are curious to find out whether the difference in time when the Mentos is placed into the coke will affect the reaction.
Hypothesis
Our hypothesis is that a can of coke when exposed to the surroundings for a longer period of time, lesser carbon dioxide will be present in it.
We will put a Mentos immediately into one of the cans to serve as a control. This can of the coke will enable us to compare with the rest of the cans where the Mentos were put in at different times.
Background Information
The group researched on the net for relevant articles which were related to our topic in order to know more about the reaction between Mentos and Coke. In all, we found 3 articles and the websites can be found in our bibliography. The articles told us about two middle-aged men who were intrigued with the effect when they dropped Mentos into Coke bottles. They decided to research, testing various configurations and tried all sorts of sweets and drinks. This made us even more interested and curious to carry out this particular experiment to see for ourselves the results which the two men had found so intriguing. These articles also reminded us of how people can discover new reactions that are intriguing just by playing around with a can of coke and Mentos while bored. You do not need a scientist for these; we can discover them ourselves. The articles also revealed how a scientist at The University of Manchester would be taking up her own version of this Coke-Mentos reaction into schools to stir up interest in chemistry. The group thinks that this would be very helpful in creating more interest as now, the methods with which students are being taught chemistry is not very engaging and interesting. By using Coke and Mentos which these students are familiar with, there may be a chance that they will be more interested in chemistry.
Through these articles which the group had found, we learnt about the science behind the spewing caused by the reaction. This is because when mint Mentos are dropped into Coke, they set off a process that causes almost all the fizz to latch onto the microscopic nooks and crannies on the candy’s surface. It so happens that Mentos happens to have thousands of these tiny pits. When the mints are dropped to the bottom of the bottle, all that gas is released and the soda is blasted out of the bottle, which results in a cola geyser.
The group feels that the articles have been extremely helpful in assisting the way of how we plan our experiment and what to use. It enabled us to have a deeper understanding of how the reaction between Coke and Mentos worked, and taught us how to set up the experiment properly in order to ensure accurate results.
Reflections & Conclusions
We felt that this SIA really helped us to explore more about the world of Chemistry. In fact, we have realised that it is interesting and that we can learn much from researching online from different websites and studying different kinds of hypothesis and information. We also learnt much from each other, taking note of our strengths and weaknesses so that we could remember how to make use of them properly in future. We realised that it is important to work together as a group in order to complete the task on hand punctually.
After conducting the two experiments, we have found out that in fact, Coke is bad for us if we drink it almost immediately after opening the can. This is becasue there will be a larger amount of carbon dioxide which will enter our body. We should open it and leave it out for a few minutes before drinking as this can help to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide that we take in. We would like to thank Mr. Kuo for his invaluable guidance and support as well as one another for encouraging and constant pushing along this project.
There are areas for improvement as well. We could have managed our time better and not do things at the eleventh hour. We should have followed our time schedule written in the proposal and so we would not have to do things all at a go. A time schedule is made in a way such that the work load is evenly spreaded out and we should follow it accordingly.
Bibliography
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5341058
http://news.yahoo.com/s/bw/20070116/bs_bw/tc20070116569213
http://biz.yahoo.com/bizwk/070116/tc20070116569213.html?.v=1
http://www.eepybird.com/science2.html
http://antoine.frostburg.edu/chem/senese/101/consumer/faq/mentos.shtml
http://www.manchester.ac.uk/aboutus/news/display/index.htm?id=84279
http://www.zap2it.com/tv/news/zap-mythbustersmentos,0,4325641.story
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/states/california/the_valley/15323794.htm
Pictures on the website: www.deviantart.com